IMCDb Forum
Who has read this topic?  Add Reply  Printable version  Activate notification
Subject: [General] Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Add Reply :: Category:  
« Previous topic
Edit Quote Delete
21/03/2007 @ 15:57:40: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
It's seems there are still some cars, trucks, buses, and what not that some of us have successfully identified, but are still listed as unknown. I'll show you two examples by me for starters:


1970-73 Dodge D-Series:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91628-unknown.html

Hendrickson:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_61929-unknown.html



When I find others, I'll post them here as well.




Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/03/2007 @ 16:22:24: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks. Sometimes such vehicles are missed by us (though that I try to check all the comments).
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid :wink:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
25/03/2007 @ 16:49:37: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks. Sometimes such vehicles are missed by us (though that I try to check all the comments).
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid :wink:

Come Ddey, take the plunge :sol:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/05/2007 @ 15:19:46: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Such a tempting offer. Though I'm not the expert I appear to be, and I'm a little worried that the number of adminstratiors might outnumber users. Anyway, this tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=101208
and this one(on the far-left):
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_75973-International-Harvester-Unknown.html

Both International Harvester-Hough Payloaders.
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/05/2007 @ 15:28:24: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Thanks.
About number of admins, well, it is not a so big problem I think, as long as not anybody becomes admin but just "serious" members. The "problem" is the admins that we do not see anymore on the site: should they still remain in the admin list?

Latest Edition: 21/05/2007 @ 15:31:59
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/05/2007 @ 22:04:05: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
I think taht is not necessary.
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail   ICQ: 226230783   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/05/2007 @ 22:10:10: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, actually this question should rather be discussed in the admin-only section :whistle:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
22/05/2007 @ 12:43:16: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
You can move the topic? :wink:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
22/05/2007 @ 20:19:03: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, the beginning of the topic should stay here... rather recreate a new one there.
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
09/07/2007 @ 14:30:31: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Well, where is it? :smile:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
09/07/2007 @ 15:21:02: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The topic for admins? Well, you can create it :tongue:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/08/2007 @ 05:41:39: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
While were on the topic, here's another non-identified vehicle. A Caterpillar D7 Tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_122635-unknown.html
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/08/2007 @ 09:47:06: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Maybe you edited your message after that I saw it :wink:
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
01/10/2007 @ 17:16:18: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
A Volvo 440 listed as 340: http://imcdb.org/vehicle_125135-Volvo-340.html

Latest Edition: 01/10/2007 @ 17:17:03
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail   Msn: atom@psyket.nu   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
21/10/2007 @ 04:29:00: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Okay, do you see this truck?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_120919-Dodge-Ram.html

It's not a Ram. It's too old to be a Ram.

Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
30/10/2007 @ 18:13:52: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
A 1969 Ford Custom listed as a 1959:

http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_135607-Ford-Custom-1959.html

Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
25/11/2007 @ 16:14:09: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
Even Stevens:
1950 Dodge Woody Station Wagon from episode 1.20:
http://evenstevens.disneytvzone.com/media/evenstevens/gallery/pictures/season1/2- 0-almost_perfect/img149.jpg


Kim Possible:
Possible Peterbilt 377 in episode 2.27:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/48%20Motor%20Ed%20Pics/PowerDVD%202006-07-06%2014-05-40-40.jpg

Chevrolet Astro in episode 1.15:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/15_All_The_News/122.jpg

The rest of my KP comments:
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1069-done_Kim_PossibleLinks.html



An old White-Freightliner in an episode of CHiPs:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_134717-unknown.html

A Mercury Monterey Police Car in "The Gumball Rally":
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=137370


Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
25/11/2007 @ 17:40:55: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The first links should rather be posted in contributions section.
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...

Latest Edition: 25/11/2007 @ 17:41:58
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Edit Quote Delete
25/11/2007 @ 19:23:58: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
The first links should rather be posted in contributions section.
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...


Ahh, so that's what I did wrong. I take it I can automatically mark one of my two most recent music videos as "[done]" as well. Am I right?


Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmail      Blog
Edit Quote Delete
25/11/2007 @ 19:45:28: Non-Unidentified Vehicles
:confused: I do not understand what you mean, but "[done]" in the title of 1st message means that this topic can be "ignored" when we (admins) search for contributions to process/add to the site.
Top  Bottom
ProfilePrivateEmailWebsite   Msn: msn@antp.beICQ: 50746223Jabber: antp@jabber.org   Blog
Add Reply :: Category:  
Bold [b]Text[/b]Italic [i]Italic[/i]Underline [u]Underline[/u]Strike Out [strike]Strike Out[/strike]
Email [email=nobody@nobody.org]Name[/email]Link [url=http://www.website.com]Text[/url]Anchor [anchor]Name[/anchor]Image [img]http://www.website.com/image.jpg[/img]
Align Left [align=left]Text[/align]Centered [align=center]Text[/align]Align Right [align=right]Text[/align]Text Justify [align=justify]Text[/text]
Color [color=#000000]Text[/color]Highlight [highlight=pascal]Text[/highlight]WidgetsSmileys :code: [:code]
PreviewSpell Checker






Ada
CSS
Cobol
CPP
HTML
Fortran
Java
JavaScript
Pascal
Perl
PHP
Python
SQL
VB
XML
Anon URL
DailyMotion
eBay
Flickr
FLV
Google Video
Metacafe
MP3
SeeqPod
Veoh
Yahoo Video
YouTube
Sign In :: Sign Up :: Lost your login or your password?
KelCommunity.be :: © 2004-2008 Akretio SPRL :: Powered by Kelare