Subject: [General] Non-Unidentified Vehicles
It's seems there are still some cars, trucks, buses, and what not that some of us have successfully identified, but are still listed as unknown. I'll show you two examples by me for starters:
1970-73 Dodge D-Series:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91628-unknown.html
Hendrickson:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_61929-unknown.html
When I find others, I'll post them here as well.
1970-73 Dodge D-Series:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_91628-unknown.html
Hendrickson:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_61929-unknown.html
When I find others, I'll post them here as well.
Thanks. Sometimes such vehicles are missed by us (though that I try to check all the comments).
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid
Note that my offer to give you admin rights is still valid
Come Ddey, take the plunge
Such a tempting offer. Though I'm not the expert I appear to be, and I'm a little worried that the number of adminstratiors might outnumber users. Anyway, this tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=101208
and this one(on the far-left):
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_75973-International-Harvester-Unknown.html
Both International Harvester-Hough Payloaders.
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=101208
and this one(on the far-left):
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_75973-International-Harvester-Unknown.html
Both International Harvester-Hough Payloaders.
Thanks.
About number of admins, well, it is not a so big problem I think, as long as not anybody becomes admin but just "serious" members. The "problem" is the admins that we do not see anymore on the site: should they still remain in the admin list?
Latest Edition: 21/05/2007 @ 15:31:59
About number of admins, well, it is not a so big problem I think, as long as not anybody becomes admin but just "serious" members. The "problem" is the admins that we do not see anymore on the site: should they still remain in the admin list?
Latest Edition: 21/05/2007 @ 15:31:59
While were on the topic, here's another non-identified vehicle. A Caterpillar D7 Tractor:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_122635-unknown.html
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_122635-unknown.html
A Volvo 440 listed as 340: http://imcdb.org/vehicle_125135-Volvo-340.html
Latest Edition: 01/10/2007 @ 17:17:03
Latest Edition: 01/10/2007 @ 17:17:03
Okay, do you see this truck?
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_120919-Dodge-Ram.html
It's not a Ram. It's too old to be a Ram.
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_120919-Dodge-Ram.html
It's not a Ram. It's too old to be a Ram.
Even Stevens:
1950 Dodge Woody Station Wagon from episode 1.20:
http://evenstevens.disneytvzone.com/media/evenstevens/gallery/pictures/season1/2- 0-almost_perfect/img149.jpg
Kim Possible:
Possible Peterbilt 377 in episode 2.27:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/48%20Motor%20Ed%20Pics/PowerDVD%202006-07-06%2014-05-40-40.jpg
Chevrolet Astro in episode 1.15:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/15_All_The_News/122.jpg
The rest of my KP comments:
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1069-done_Kim_PossibleLinks.html
An old White-Freightliner in an episode of CHiPs:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_134717-unknown.html
A Mercury Monterey Police Car in "The Gumball Rally":
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=137370
1950 Dodge Woody Station Wagon from episode 1.20:
http://evenstevens.disneytvzone.com/media/evenstevens/gallery/pictures/season1/2- 0-almost_perfect/img149.jpg
Kim Possible:
Possible Peterbilt 377 in episode 2.27:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/48%20Motor%20Ed%20Pics/PowerDVD%202006-07-06%2014-05-40-40.jpg
Chevrolet Astro in episode 1.15:
http://caps.kpfanworld.com/images/15_All_The_News/122.jpg
The rest of my KP comments:
http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-1069-done_Kim_PossibleLinks.html
An old White-Freightliner in an episode of CHiPs:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_134717-unknown.html
A Mercury Monterey Police Car in "The Gumball Rally":
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=137370
The first links should rather be posted in contributions section.
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...
When you add pics in a topic marked as "[done]", if you do not remove the "done" of the title of first message, we will probably miss it...
Ahh, so that's what I did wrong. I take it I can automatically mark one of my two most recent music videos as "[done]" as well. Am I right?


















I do not understand what you mean, but "[done]" in the title of 1st message means that this topic can be "ignored" when we (admins) search for contributions to process/add to the site.